You've already concluded it is a bug...

I recall now, I made it optional because that code makes no sense on the client side only, while the reactive streams api is also pulled from the reactor dep...

Cheers, Sergey
On 04/02/18 18:12, Andriy Redko wrote:
Same conclusion, it shouldn't be optional/provided.
Thanks for spotting it.

Best Regards,
     Andriy Redko

JDA> That's what I'm asking basically.  If you look at
JDA> 
https://github.com/apache/cxf/blob/master/rt/rs/extensions/reactor/pom.xml#L47-L49
JDA> I
JDA> don't believe it should be provided/optional.

JDA> On Sun, Feb 4, 2018 at 12:49 PM Sergey Beryozkin <sberyoz...@gmail.com>
JDA> wrote:

Why should be optional ?

Sergey
On 04/02/18 14:00, John D. Ament wrote:
Hi,

As far as I can tell, the dependency on reactive streams isn't optional
in
the project reactor module.  I'm wondering, was this just a typo, or am I
missing something?

John





Reply via email to