jimma edited a comment on pull request #850:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/850#issuecomment-922147653
> My gut feeling is that this is "wrong". This adds some additional direct
"jaxws" dependencies on cxf-core which is something we've tried to reduce. My
thought would be that the WebFaultOutInterceptor should have an additional "if"
near the bottom before calling the super.handleMessage(message). Something like:
> } else if (f instanceof SoapFault && f.getCause() instanceof
SOAPFaultException
&& ((SOAPFaultException)f.getCause()).getFault().hasDetail()) {
return;
> }
@dkulp Thanks for the comments. I thought about this solution, but I am not
sure if there will be some failure goes into FaultOutInterceptorChain when wsa
is enabled. When wsa is enabled, will it go into WebFaultOutInterceptor first
?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
