Hi Freeman, Do you know why we don't require this with JDK8 and only for JDK9 and plus ? I see the Export package info in META-INF built with JDK11 without this configuration already has this export package entry :
Export-Package: org.apache.cxf.tracing;version="3.5.3",org.apache.cxf. management.jmx;version="3.5.3",org.apache.cxf.management.jmx.type;ver sion="3.5.3",org.apache.cxf.management.jmx.export.runtime;version="3. 5.3",org.apache.cxf.management.utils;version="3.5.3",org.apache.cxf.m anagement.persistence;version="3.5.3",org.apache.cxf.management.count ers;version="3.5.3",org.apache.cxf.management.interceptor;version="3. 5.3",META-INF.versions.11.org.apache.cxf.tracing;version="3.5.3",META -INF.versions.11.org.apache.cxf.management.jmx;version="3.5.3",META-I NF.versions.11.org.apache.cxf.management.jmx.type;version="3.5.3",MET A-INF.versions.11.org.apache.cxf.management.jmx.export.runtime;versio n="3.5.3",META-INF.versions.11.org.apache.cxf.management.utils;versio n="3.5.3",META-INF.versions.11.org.apache.cxf.management.persistence; version="3.5.3",META-INF.versions.11.org.apache.cxf.management.counte rs;version="3.5.3",META-INF.versions.11.org.apache.cxf.management.int erceptor;version="3.5.3" Cheers, Jim On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 3:04 AM Freeman Fang <freeman.f...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Jim, > > Please change the rt/management/pom.xml like this. > > <configuration> > <obrRepository>NONE</obrRepository> > <instructions> > - > > <Export-Package>org.apache.cxf.management*,org.apache.cxf.tracing*</Export-Package> > + <Export-Package> > + > org.apache.cxf.management.counters, > + > org.apache.cxf.management.interceptor, > + > org.apache.cxf.management.persistence, > + > org.apache.cxf.management.utils, > + > org.apache.cxf.management.jmx, > + > org.apache.cxf.management.jmx.export.runtime, > + org.apache.cxf.tracing* > + </Export-Package> > </instructions> > <niceManifest>true</niceManifest> > </configuration> > This fine-grained export package can avoid including the package from > cxf-core module. > > Best Regards > Freeman > > On Mon, Apr 18, 2022 at 11:50 PM Jim Ma <mail2ji...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Thanks Andriy. Jira is filled : >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8695 >> and PRs are sent. >> >> >> On Sun, Apr 17, 2022 at 9:28 AM Andriy Redko <drr...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > Hey Jim, >> > >> > This is interesting, I believe it is not needed, only some compiler args >> > need >> > tailoring (for JDK-11) but the classes should not be copied to >> versions/11. >> > Thanks! >> > >> > Best Regards, >> > Andriy Redko >> > >> > JM> When building cxf-rt-management 3.5.1 with JDK11, some api classes >> are >> > JM> copied to the jar file. It looks like these classes are copied by >> the >> > JM> maven-bundle-plugin from java9-plus profile : >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > JM> *<profile> <id>java9-plus</id> <activation> >> > <jdk>[9,)</jdk> >> > JM> </activation> <build> <plugins> <plugin> >> > JM> <groupId>org.apache.felix</groupId> >> > JM> <artifactId>maven-bundle-plugin</artifactId> >> > JM> <extensions>true</extensions> <configuration> >> > JM> <obrRepository>NONE</obrRepository> >> > <instructions> >> > >> > JM> >> > >> <Export-Package>org.apache.cxf.management*,org.apache.cxf.tracing*</Export-Package> >> > JM> </instructions> >> > JM> <niceManifest>true</niceManifest> </configuration> >> > JM> </plugin--> </plugins> </build></profile> * >> > >> > JM> Why does cxf-rt-management need to copy these classes to the jar >> file >> > ? Is >> > JM> it still needed to duplicate these classes from cxf-core ? >> > >> > JM> Thanks, >> > JM> Jim >> > >> > >> >
