I think there might be a bug that could be considered a blocker. Found a
schema that has a lengthKind="pattern" like this:

  dfdl:lengthPattern="[\x00-\xFF]{0,80}"

So it should match a length of zero to 80 bytes of any value. It looks
like even if there are 80 bytes available, this only matches at most 64.
I've got a simple one line fix that I'm testing now. I think this
probably deserves an rc2.


Another thing I noticed is the scaladoc generated by 2.12 has some
pretty ugly links. For example, the parse section in this following page
has a really hard to read link, we should make modifications to make
that more legible:

https://daffodil.apache.org/docs/2.2.0/scaladoc/org/apache/daffodil/sapi/index.html

I'm not sure if this would be considered a blocker, but would be nice to
have if we will need an rc2.

- Steve


On 08/20/2018 09:44 AM, Mike Beckerle wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I'd like to call a vote to release Apache Daffodil (Incubating) 2.2.0-rc1.
> 
> All distribution packages, including signatures, digests, etc. can be
> found at:
> 
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/daffodil/2.2.0-rc1/
> 
> Staging artifacts can be found at:
> 
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedaffodil-1003/
> 
> This release has been signed with PGP key 13A680AF, corresponding to
> [email protected], which is included in the repository's KEYS file.
> This key can be found on keyservers, such as:
> 
> http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x13A680AF
> 
> The release candidate has been tagged in git with v2.2.0-rc1.
> 
> For reference, here is a list of all closed JIRAs tagged with 2.2.0:
> 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=-1&jql=
> project%20%3D%20DAFFODIL%20AND%20status%20in%20(Resolved%2C%20Closed)%20AND%
> 20fixVersion%20%3D%202.2.0%20ORDER%20BY%20key%20ASC%2C%
> 20status%20DESC%2C%20updated%20DESC
> 
> For a summary of the changes in this release, see:
> 
> https://daffodil.apache.org/releases/2.2.0/
> 
> Please review and vote. The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> The vote ends at 2018-08-23T10:00:00-04:00  aka Thursday 23 August, 2018 at
> 10 AM EDT US.
> 
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> 
> My vote: +1
> 
> Thanks,
> - Mike
> 

Reply via email to