[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAFFODIL-2036?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Josh Adams reassigned DAFFODIL-2036:
------------------------------------

    Assignee: Josh Adams

> poor diagnostic - choice with sequences as branches with all optional content.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DAFFODIL-2036
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAFFODIL-2036
>             Project: Daffodil
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Middle "End"
>    Affects Versions: 2.2.0
>            Reporter: Michael Beckerle
>            Assignee: Josh Adams
>            Priority: Major
>
> Suppose you have this choice:
> <choice>
>    <sequence>
>        <element name="x" ... minOccurs="0"/>
>     </sequence>
>     <sequence>
>        <element name="y" ... minOccurs="0"/>
>     </sequence>
> </choice>
> <element name="foo" .../>
> You get an SDE with this message:
> Schema Definition Error: UPA violation. Multiple choice branches begin with 
> {http://example.com}foo
> Note that elements with dfdl:outputValueCalc cannot be used to distinguish 
> choice branches.
> The offending choice branches are:
> sequence[1] at Location in file:/tmp/s1_5963264522094411444.dfdl.xsd
> sequence[2] at Location in file:/tmp/s1_5963264522094411444.dfdl.xsd
> This occurs because the two branches of the choice meet the letter of the law 
> by bing sequences which are considered "required", but as their content is 
> all optional and they have no framing, they are conceptually optional. 
> So there's really no way to look at the infoset and decide which arm of the 
> choice.
> The error here should be that the content of a choice branch is entirely 
> optional which isn't allowed. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to