INFRA has completed the change (INFRA-19336). All robot emails should now go to commits@ instead of dev@.
I've also updated the community page of the website with accurate descriptions of the lists. Anyone not subscribed to commits@ but would like to continue to receive emails about new pull requests, code review comments, or JIRA changes should subscribe to commits@ by sending an email to commits-subscr...@daffodil.apache.org On 10/24/19 7:29 AM, Steve Lawrence wrote: > Since there are no objections, I'll request that INFRA make the change. > > - Steve > > On 10/21/19 10:35 AM, Beckerle, Mike wrote: >> Reserving dev for topical discussions from developers seems wise. >> Robot-created emails should always be separable. >> +1 from me. >> ________________________________ >> From: Steve Lawrence <slawre...@apache.org> >> Sent: Monday, October 21, 2019 10:16 AM >> To: dev@daffodil.apache.org <dev@daffodil.apache.org> >> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] comm...@daffodil.apache.org >> >> Seems perfectly reasonable to me. All the PRs and comments definitely >> get a bit overwhelming and can hide actual discussions. We already have >> a commits@ list but only commits go there. Makes sense to send all other >> commit related stuff there as well. >> >> +1 from me >> >> >> On 10/21/19 7:13 AM, Julian Feinauer wrote: >>> Hi folks, >>> >>> I follow the Daffodil ML since a while now but I already recognized that >>> its extremly “noisy” with tons of reports about commits, PRs, Comments and >>> so on. >>> At PLC4X we added an additional list commits@... Where we send all those >>> things (and where PMC and Committers should be subscribed) to keep the dev >>> list a bit quite and more discussion focused. >>> >>> What do you think? >>> >>> Julian >>> >> >> >
