+1

I checked:


  *   'daffodil --version' output
  *   Builds locally
  *   Passes test suite locally
  *   Non publically available schema (MDA); produces same output as under 2.4.0
  *   Current bugs in Jira for 2.4.0 (nothing that strikes me as blocking).

________________________________
From: Steve Lawrence <slawre...@apache.org>
Sent: Monday, January 6, 2020 1:38 PM
To: dev@daffodil.apache.org <dev@daffodil.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.5.0-rc2

+1

I checked:

- incubating in name
- signatures and hashes correct
- DISCLAIMER exists
- NOTICE and LICENSE are accurate
- RAT check passes
- No unexpected binary files
- Can compile from source
- Tested RPM and Windows installers
- Validated source release is the same as the git tag
- Validated that compiled source jars have the same content as jars in
helper binaries


On 1/6/20 12:05 PM, Kilo, Olabusayo wrote:
> +1
>
> I checked the release page, I notice a typo in the 2nd sentence, it says 
> 'UserDefineFunction' instead of 'UserDefinedFunction'.
>
> On 1/3/20 11:29 AM, Steve Lawrence wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to call a vote to release Apache Daffodil (incubating)
> 2.5.0-rc2.
>
> All distribution packages, including signatures, digests, etc. can be
> found at:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/daffodil/2.5.0-rc2/
>
> Staging artifacts can be found at:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedaffodil-1012/
>
> This release has been signed with PGP key 36F3494B033AE661,
> corresponding to slawre...@apache.org<mailto:slawre...@apache.org>, which is 
> included in the KEYS
> file here:
>
> https://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/daffodil/KEYS
>
> The release candidate has been tagged in git with v2.5.0-rc2.
>
> For reference, here is a list of all closed JIRAs tagged with 2.5.0:
>
> https://s.apache.org/daffodil-issues-2.5.0
>
> For a summary of the changes in this release, see:
>
> https://daffodil.apache.org/releases/2.5.0/
>
> Please review and vote. The vote will be open for at least 72 hours
> (Monday 6 January, 2020, 11:30 AM EST).
>
> [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
> Thanks,
> - Steve
>
>
> --
> Best Regards
> Lola K.
>

Reply via email to