Have Lola check when adding to the KEYS file. Sent from my iPhone
> On Mar 26, 2020, at 6:06 AM, Steve Lawrence <slawre...@apache.org> wrote: > > Sounds good to have Lola do it when the time comes then. I think there > will be some slight changes to the release process since I believe only > PMC/PPMC members have permission to write to /dist/release, but I think > as a committer Lola should have permissions to do everything else. > >> On 3/25/20 3:58 PM, Adams, Joshua wrote: >> I did have interest, but it doesn't look like I'll have the time to do any >> Daffodil work for at least the next 2 weeks. I have non-issue with someone >> else taking this one. >> >> Josh >> >> On Mar 25, 2020 3:56 PM, Olabusayo Kilo <ok...@tresys.com> wrote: >> I'd like to have the below done for 2.6.0 >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAFFODIL-2305 - Remove some unused >> methods from Term.scala >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAFFODIL-2275 - Reduce code smells >> and make some configuration changes to Sonarqube >> >> I don't mind managing the release, although I think Josh A had expressed >> interest last time. >> >> >>> On 3/25/20 3:24 PM, Beckerle, Mike wrote: >>> I have two issues I'd like fixed for 2.6.0 >>> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAFFODIL-2302 - this is making it >>> difficult to update a Link16 schema that is in use by multiple parties. >>> >>> There's a second issue, which is that we still have this "NadaParsers are >>> supposed to optimize out" problem. Came up in this same schema again even >>> after the fix which supposedly addressed it. So I think the fix solved >>> some, but not all of this problem. I will try to recreate this and reopen >>> the ticket if it is still happening. >>> >>> I don't want to manage the release, but I definitely think it's better if >>> it isn't Steve L., ... I could have my arm twisted. >>> ________________________________ >>> From: Steve Lawrence <slawre...@apache.org> >>> Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 3:12 PM >>> To: dev@daffodil.apache.org <dev@daffodil.apache.org> >>> Subject: [DISCUSS] Daffodil 2.6.0 Release >>> >>> With the last of the changes recently merged to support improved schema >>> compilation speed and memory, I think now is a good time to start >>> discussing the next release. >>> >>> 1) Does anyone have any changes that are close to being ready to merge >>> or bugs that are worth delaying the next release until resolved? >>> >>> 2) Does anyone want to volunteer to be the release manager for 2.6.0? >>> The release process [1] now uses containers for most of the heavy >>> lifting, and since I did it last time it would be good to get someone >>> else familiar with the new release process and make sure the container >>> works for someone other than myself. >>> >>> - Steve >>> >> -- >> Best Regards >> Lola K. >> >> >
