I will create a PR for this. ________________________________ From: Steve Lawrence <slawre...@apache.org> Sent: Monday, April 6, 2020 10:24 AM To: dev@daffodil.apache.org <dev@daffodil.apache.org> Subject: Re: Using Scala 2.12.11
It shouldn't be a problem. Scala is pretty strict about forward and backward compatibility for 2.X releases [1]. This update sounds good to me, and should be a quick fix/merge as long as all our tests pass. Mike, do you want to create the PR? - Steve [1] https://docs.scala-lang.org/overviews/core/binary-compatibility-of-scala-releases.html On 4/6/20 10:13 AM, Sloane, Brandon wrote: > I'm not too familiar with how Scala version compatibility works, but I get > the sense it is pretty strict. Would we risk breaking things for people > running 2.12.11? > ________________________________ > From: Beckerle, Mike <mbecke...@tresys.com> > Sent: Monday, April 6, 2020 10:10 AM > To: dev@daffodil.apache.org <dev@daffodil.apache.org> > Subject: Using Scala 2.12.11 > > I recently heard of a developer trying to use VSCode for Scala on Daffodil. > > Looks like there is a requirement for Scala version 2.12.11, which is just a > minor point release from what we've been using which is 2.12.10. > > Can we move to 2.12.11 for the 2.6.0 release? > > Mike Beckerle | Principal Engineer > [Owl Cyber Defense]<http://owlcyberdefense.com> > [cid:0e38d0e6-2cc6-4b61-8d58-e127df0e8201] is now a part of > Owl<https://owlcyberdefense.com/news/owl-cyber-defense-tresys-technology-announce-merger/> > P +1-781-330-0412 > W owlcyberdefense.com<http://www.owlcyberdefense.com> >