+1
I checked:
* all developer tests pass (test, it:test)
* all ibm compatibility tests pass for all known schemas
* includes all the portable ones at github DFDLSchemas, and a few other
non-public schemas
* all known schemas pass daffodil tests - excepting vcard - which is a
known documented regression
* This includes testing the user-defined-functions feature, which is
used by one non-public DFDL schema
* examples like the java API "helloworld" example pass their tests.
* Release notes page looks good.
* Scaladoc/javadoc looks good.
________________________________
From: Steve Lawrence <slawre...@apache.org>
Sent: Monday, May 17, 2021 10:21 AM
To: dev@daffodil.apache.org <dev@daffodil.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil 3.1.0-rc2
+1
I checked:
[OK] hashes and signatures of source and helper binaries are correct
[OK] signature of git tag is correct
[OK] source release matches git tag (minus KEYS file)
[OK] source compiles and all tests pass (both en_US and de_DE LANG)
[OK] jars in helper binaries and the repository are exactly the same
[OK] jars built from source are exactly the same as helper binary jars
[OK] src, binaries, and jars include correct LICENSE/NOTICE
[OK] RAT check passes
[OK] no unexpected binaries in source
[OK] distributed dependencies in helper binaries are same as from maven
[OK] rpm and msi install and run with basic usage
[OK] ~60 public and private DFDL schema projects pass tests
[OK] No issues found in JavaDoc and ScalaDoc
On 5/17/21 9:55 AM, Interrante, John A (GE Research, US) wrote:
> +1
>
> I checked (for most items, using WSL2/Ubuntu 20.04 on my laptop):
>
> [OK] rpm installs correctly on Fedora Workstation 34
>
> [OK] some daffodil CLI commands work (generate c, test on runtime2 examples)
>
> [OK] signature of git tag is correct
>
> [OK] hash and signature of each download is correct
>
> [OK] src, bins, and jars include correct LICENSE/NOTICE/DISCLAIMER
>
> [OK] source release matches git tag (minus KEYS file)
>
> [OK] no unexpected binaries in source
>
> [OK] source compiles and all tests pass
>
> [OK] RAT check passes
>
> [OK] jars built from source have the same content as helper binary jars
>
> John
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steve Lawrence <slawre...@apache.org>
> Sent: Friday, May 14, 2021 3:27 PM
> To: dev@daffodil.apache.org
> Subject: EXT: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil 3.1.0-rc2
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to call a vote to release Apache Daffodil 3.1.0-rc2.
>
> All distribution packages, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found
> at:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/daffodil/3.1.0-rc2/
>
> Staging artifacts can be found at:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedaffodil-1023/
>
> This release has been signed with PGP key 36F3494B033AE661, corresponding to
> slawre...@apache.org, which is included in the KEYS file here:
>
> https://downloads.apache.org/daffodil/KEYS
>
> The release candidate has been tagged in git with v3.1.0-rc2.
>
> For reference, here is a list of all closed JIRAs tagged with 3.1.0:
>
> https://s.apache.org/daffodil-issues-3.1.0
>
> For a summary of the changes in this release, see:
>
> https://daffodil.apache.org/releases/3.1.0/
>
> Please review and vote. The vote will be open for at least 72 hours (Monday,
> 17 May 2021, 4pm EST).
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
