How hard is it to refactor these 6 files so that all new code is in separate files from all preserved original code?
Assume one-liner changes to original files (like calling MockDebugger changed to call DaffodilDebugger) are allowed. We either have to separate these 6 blended files, or convince legal and the incubator-pmc that blended files are ok because they originally had the MIT license. I definitely don't want to bother with that unless the refactoring exercise here is hard. ________________________________ From: John Wass <jwa...@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, September 10, 2021 1:02 PM To: dev@daffodil.apache.org <dev@daffodil.apache.org> Subject: Re: daffodil-vscode - how to package and identify the contribution - some git questions Mike - Those were renames from the original versions that had "mock" in their names. commit 383fd4882a8fe51adf21b5ae31fe252056800447 On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 12:54 PM Beckerle, Mike < mbecke...@owlcyberdefense.com> wrote: > > John Wass said: > > I had a few more (6) source files as modified.. > > extension.ts > debugAdapter.ts > daffodilRuntime.ts > daffodilDebug.ts > adapter.test.ts > activateDaffodilDebug.ts > > The 3 files with daffodil or Daffodil in their names, aren't those new > files? Or were those based on provided files, but the file was renamed as > well as the content modified? > > ...mikeb > >
