Ah, right, I didn't think about registering it from within the test suite object.

Though, that isn't possible for the CLI, and I'd guess it also isn't possible from the new VSCode debugger.


On 10/6/21 4:09 PM, Mike Beckerle wrote:
Much easier than that.

Look at TestAIS.scala:

https://github.com/apache/daffodil/pull/651/files#diff-59f6bd4163627aa9de0ed8b2ff04ba8c60c7c45fc99e6abed430d0a6a46c4c91

You just call LayerCompilerRegistry.Register(
AISPayloadArmoringLayerCompiler)
 From the test object.

That's all an application using Daffodil with a custom layer has to do
also.

Honestly, I almost prefer this to dynamic loading.


On Wed, Oct 6, 2021 at 3:50 PM Steve Lawrence <slawre...@apache.org> wrote:

Don't those only work because they are built in to Daffodil and
pre-registered? If someone wants to keep their layer outside of
Daffodil, it needs to be manually registered, but that can't be done by
the TDML Runner or CLI?

On 10/6/21 3:38 PM, Mike Beckerle wrote:
The TDML runner invoked from JUnit works fine.
The AIS Payload Armoring, and the CheckDigits and the IPv4 examples in
daffodil-test work this way, and anyone's DFDL schema could do the same
thing.

I plan to update the ethernetIP and PCAP schemas to compute their
checksums
this way.

Only the CLI is left out.


On Wed, Oct 6, 2021 at 2:26 PM Steve Lawrence <slawre...@apache.org>
wrote:

If we don't support dynamic loading and instead require that users
manually register the layer, that means that externally defined layers
cannot be tested using the TDML runner, right? It also means there's no
way to run schemas with external layers using the CLI?

I guess that's not an issue until there are external layers, so maybe
not critical, but still feels pretty important. Maybe adding it to the
next release is reasonable, since that's probably when external layers
might start showing up?

On 10/6/21 1:47 PM, Mike Beckerle wrote:
I have done a bunch of improvements to the code for this layer loading
based on the prior PR.

It is now stabilized and worth it to examine/reexamine the PR at this
point.

https://github.com/apache/daffodil/pull/651

I have also changed the goals here somewhat. I split out the
defining/creation of a Java API for layers, and true dynamic loading
via
service loaders into a separate JIRA ticket DAFFODIL-2567.

I think that experience with what we have so far makes sense before
defining any Java API for doing this. I also think the need for true
dynamic detect and load behavior is far less critical than the basic
ability to define these in external jars that aren't part of daffodil.

This PR now includes just the modularization of layers, so they can be
written in scala and defined in a jar outside of Daffodil, An
application
must register them for use by calling
LayerCompilerRegistry.register(...).

All the built-in layers are in daffodil-runtime1-layers which is a new
module.

Other layers are defined in daffodil-test for testing that
checksums/check
digits work. The example AIS payload encoding layer is also now defined
and
tested in daffodil-test.

On Sat, Sep 25, 2021 at 8:31 PM Mike Beckerle <mbecke...@apache.org>
wrote:

Please see:


https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/DAFFODIL/Proposal%3A+Dynamically+loading+Layer+Transformations

Also: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAFFODIL-1927

See related PR: https://github.com/apache/daffodil/pull/643 which is
for
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAFFODIL-2221

Please add comments or directly edit that wiki page, or discuss in
this
email thread if you prefer.










Reply via email to