Ignore the " Only found some in the dummy website copy in the integration-tests" guess that's in my template (not sure why)
-----Original Message----- From: Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> Sent: Donnerstag, 2. Dezember 2021 18:18 To: dev@daffodil.apache.org Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil 3.2.0-rc1 +1 (binding) Built on Windows 10 with OpenJDK 11.0.13, SBT 1.5.5 Chris [MINOR] Download all staged artifacts under the url specified in the release vote email. - Would be nice to have the RELEASE_NOTES and README in the SVN [MINOR] Verify the signature is correct. - No trust-chain to the ASF web-of-trust (Consider joining an Apache Key-Signing Party) [OK] Check if the signature references an Apache email address. [OK] Verify the SHA512 hashes. [OK] Unzip the archive. [MINOR] Verify the existence of LICENSE, NOTICE, README, RELEASE_NOTES files in the extracted source bundle. - Would be nice to have RELEASE_NOTES [MINOR] Verify the content of LICENSE, NOTICE, README, RELEASE_NOTES files in the extracted source bundle. - When sources are included from outside, except for the DTDs, no source (like a gitub link) is provided where the code came from. This makes truly verifying LICENSE and NOTICE a bit tricky (or not possible). [MINOR] [RM] Verify the staged source README, RELEASE_NOTE files correspond to those in the extracted source bundle. - As there are no files in the SVN, nothing to compare. [OK] [RM] Run RAT externally to ensure there are no surprises. [OK] Search for SNAPSHOT references: Only found some in the dummy website copy in the integration-tests [OK] Search for Copyright references, and if they are in headers, make sure these files containing them are mentioned in the LICENSE file. [MINOR] Build the project according to the information in the README.md file. - Tried building it, certainly didn't get it right especially cause I couldn't find any "Setup for development" guide that tells a user which software he needs (ok .. you list the software in the readme, but not where to get it from and how to set it up) - In the plc4x project we have something like this: http://plc4x.apache.org/developers/preparing/index.html - And we also have automatically executed scripts in place that verify all is setup correctly: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/blob/develop/src/main/script/prerequisiteCheck.groovy (This makes it a lot easier for users to get started ... might be worth considering) -----Original Message----- From: Mike Beckerle <mbecke...@apache.org> Sent: Mittwoch, 1. Dezember 2021 20:04 To: dev@daffodil.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil 3.2.0-rc1 Hi all, I'd like to call a vote to release Apache Daffodil 3.2.0-rc1. All distribution packages, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/daffodil/3.2.0-rc1/ Staging artifacts can be found at: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedaffodil-1025/ This release has been signed with PGP key 13A680AF, corresponding to mbecke...@apache.org, which is included in the KEYS file here: https://downloads.apache.org/daffodil/KEYS The release candidate has been tagged in git with v3.2.0-rc1. For reference, here is a list of all closed JIRAs tagged with 3.2.0: https://s.apache.org/daffodil-issues-3.2.0 For a summary of the changes in this release, see: https://daffodil.apache.org/releases/3.2.0/ Please review and vote. The vote will be open for at least 72 hours (Monday December 6, 14:00 EST.US). [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) Thanks, - Mike Beckerle
