+1

Verified/closed all v3.4.0 resolved JIRA tickets 
Executed Sub-project SBT test suites on Java 8
Executed Sub-project SBT test suites on Java 11
Executed Sub-project SBT test suites on Java 17
Compiled/saved nightly run schemas on Java 8
Compiled/saved nightly run schemas on Java 11
Compiled/saved nightly run schemas on Java 17
Executed the nightly performance test suite on Java 8
Executed the nightly performance test suite on Java 11
Executed the nightly performance test suite on Java 17
Installed apache-daffodil-3.4.0-bin.msi on Windows 10 platform. Smoke tested 
with daffodil parse, unparsed and performance commands.
Reverified nightly test suite with -I exi (schcema un-aware) processing.
Reverified nightly test suite with -I exisa (schcema aware) processing.

Dave



-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Lawrence <[email protected]> 
Sent: Wednesday, November 2, 2022 6:24 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [EXTERNAL][VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil 3.4.0-rc2

[EXTERNAL EMAIL] DO NOT CLICK links or attachments unless you recognize the 
sender and know the content is safe.

Hi all,

I'd like to call a vote to release Apache Daffodil 3.4.0-rc2.

All distribution packages, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:

https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/daffodil/3.4.0-rc2/

Staging artifacts can be found at:

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedaffodil-1032/

This release has been signed with PGP key 36F3494B033AE661, corresponding to 
[email protected], which is included in the KEYS file here:

https://downloads.apache.org/daffodil/KEYS

The release candidate has been tagged in git with v3.4.0-rc2.

For reference, here is a list of all closed JIRAs tagged with 3.4.0:

https://s.apache.org/daffodil-issues-3.4.0

For a summary of the changes in this release, see:

https://daffodil.apache.org/releases/3.4.0/

Please review and vote. The vote will be open for at least 72 hours (Monday, 7 
November 2022, 18:30 EDT).

[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)

Thanks,
- Steve

Reply via email to