Egad. Yes, that is it.
On Sat, Mar 9, 2024 at 5:11 PM Steve Lawrence <slawre...@apache.org> wrote: > Could this be some kind of IDE display thing, like it's shortening > META-INF/services to M.services in a display to save a few characters, but > behind the scenes it's still META-INF/services? > > On 2024-03-09 02:59 PM, Mike Beckerle wrote: > > Does anyone know why Daffodil searches for the files that advertise SPI > > services for layers, charsets, and validators under resources/M.services > > instead of the standard resources/META-INF/services directory, as is used > > by the UDF SPI services? > > > > The code base doesn't contain the string "M.services" as far as I can > tell. > > > > My new layer stuff only works for the layers built into Daffodil if the > > services file is under M.services, but for a separate layer project I > have > > that is defined outside of daffodil, the services file needs to be under > > META-INF/services or it is not found. > > > > Google searching for SPI info suggests "M.services" would have to be > > configured somehow, but I cannot find any such configuration. > > > > Mike Beckerle > > Apache Daffodil PMC | daffodil.apache.org > > OGF DFDL Workgroup Co-Chair | > www.ogf.org/ogf/doku.php/standards/dfdl/dfdl > > Owl Cyber Defense | www.owlcyberdefense.com > > > >
