+1 (binding) I checked:
[NOT OK] links in email are correct except https://s.apache.org/daffodil-issues-3.11.0 which is giving a "can't view this page" error. I'm not logged in to jira, but I assume users shouldn't need a jira account to view the issues [OK] verified Summary of Changes pages (maven, sbt, download and dnf) [OK] verified download of binary and source [OK] Successfully used apache-daffodil-3.11.0-bin.tgz [OK] JavaDoc and ScalaDoc are correct -- Lola Kilo ________________________________ From: Adams, Joshua <jad...@owlcyberdefense.com.INVALID> Sent: Friday, May 30, 2025 2:18 PM To: dev@daffodil.apache.org <dev@daffodil.apache.org> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil 3.11.0-rc2 [You don't often get email from jad...@owlcyberdefense.com.invalid. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ] +1 I checked: [OK] hashes and signatures of source and helper binaries are correct [OK] source and helper binaries are 100% reproducible [OK] ~80 public and private DFDL schema projects pass tests Did notice one small bug, but not worth holding up a release - see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAFFODIL-3001 Also ran some preliminary performance measurements across some schema projects. Seeing a consistent 5-10% improvement in throughput/latency across both parsing and unparsing when compared to Daffodil 3.10.0. Josh Adams ________________________________ From: Steve Lawrence <slawre...@apache.org> Sent: Friday, May 30, 2025 7:36 AM To: dev@daffodil.apache.org <dev@daffodil.apache.org> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil 3.11.0-rc2 +1 (binding) I checked: [OK] hashes and signatures of source and helper binaries are correct [OK] source and helper binaries are 100% reproducible [OK] signature of git tag verifies [OK] source release matches git tag (minus KEYS file) [OK] source compiles and all tests pass (both en_US and de_DE) [OK] helper tgz/zip/msi/rpm/maven have the same content except where expected [OK] src, binaries, and jars include correct LICENSE/NOTICE [OK] RAT check passes [OK] no unexpected binaries in source [OK] rpm and msi install and run with basic usage [OK] ~80 public and private DFDL schema projects pass tests [OK] no issues found in JavaDoc and ScalaDoc [OK] no open CVEs found using sbt dependencyCheck [OK] Daffodil NiFi processor builds and tests pass [OK] Daffodil SBT plugin builds and tests pass On 2025-05-23 02:02 PM, Adams, Joshua wrote: > Hi all, > > I'd like to call a vote to release Apache Daffodil 3.11.0-rc2. > > All distribution packages, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found > at: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/daffodil/3.11.0-rc2/ > > Staging artifacts can be found at: > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedaffodil-1052/ > > This release has been signed with PGP key 989D39300ACC1866, corresponding to > jad...@apache.org, which is included in the KEYS file here: > > https://downloads.apache.org/daffodil/KEYS > > The release candidate has been tagged in git with v3.11.0-rc1. > > For reference, here is a list of all resolved JIRA issues tagged with 3.11.0: > > https://s.apache.org/daffodil-issues-3.11.0 > > For a summary of the changes in this release, see: > > https://daffodil.apache.org/releases/3.11.0/ > > Please review and vote. The vote will be open for at least 72 hours (Friday, > 23 May 2025, 2:00 PM EST). > > [ ] +1 approve > [ ] +0 no opinion > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > Thanks, > - Josh
