+1

On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 12:49 AM Sam Shah <shah...@umich.edu> wrote:

> +1
>
> ________________________________
> From: Eyal Allweil <e...@apache.org>
> Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2023 11:44:24 PM
> To: dev@datafu.apache.org <dev@datafu.apache.org>
> Subject: [VOTE] Apache DataFu 1.7.0 release RC0, part two (Scala 2.12)
>
> Hi all,
>
> As promised in my previous email, I'd like to call a vote to release Apache
> DataFu's Scala 2.12 artifacts.
>
> Almost everything that was checked before remains the same. I have not
> created a new source candidate - the only difference is that I manually
> overrode the scalaCompatVersion property to be 2.12 instead of 2.11 during
> the build/upload process. (the uploadArchives command, as described in our
> release instructions)
>
> The artifacts (i.e. JARs) corresponding to this new release candidate can
> be
> found here:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedatafu-1014
>
> Instructions for how to build against the artifacts in the staging
> repository can be found in the RELEASE instructions (
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=datafu.git;a=blob_plain;f=RELEASE.md;hb=HEAD
> ).
>
> These files have been signed with PGP key
> F4035CD23568D1D89F2CB69D4367FFCB3770D9C3, corresponding to
> e...@apache.org, which is included in the repository's KEYS file.  This
> key can be found on keyservers (e.g. gpg --keyserver keys.openpgp.org
> --search-key F4035CD23568D1D89F2CB69D4367FFCB3770D9C3).
>
> Instructions for how to verify checksums and signatures can be found in the
> README (
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=datafu.git;a=blob_plain;f=README.md;hb=HEAD
> ).
>
> There are no new tags/branches for these artifacts - branch 1.7.0 and tag
> release-1.7.0-rc0 are still valid.
>
> Please download the release candidate, check the hashes, check the
> signatures, test it, and vote.  The vote will be open for 72 hours (ends on
> January 23rd at 10 am GMT+3).
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
> My vote: +1
>
> Thanks,
> Eyal Allweil
>

Reply via email to