Hi all, sorry for the last response. my vote if of course +1 ! Ohad.
On Tue, 27 Jun 2023 at 10:10, Eyal Allweil <e...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi all, > > As I wrote yesterday, I'd like to call a vote to release Apache DataFu > 1.8.0. Like our last release, this is only datafu-spark (there are no > changes in the other modules). However, this time I have published > artifacts for both Scala 2.11 and 2.12 - we'll have a single vote for both > flavors. Their sources are identical. > > For a summary of the changes in this release, see: > https://github.com/apache/datafu/blob/release-1.8.0-rc0/changes.md > > The source release candidate RC0 can be downloaded here: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/datafu/apache-datafu-1.8.0-rc0/ > > The artifacts (i.e. JARs) corresponding to this release candidate can be > found here: > > For Scala 2.11 > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedatafu-1015 > > For Scala 2.12 > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedatafu-1016 > > Instructions for how to build against the artifacts in the staging > repository can be found in the RELEASE instructions ( > https://github.com/apache/datafu/blob/main/RELEASE.md). > > Files have been signed with PGP key > F4035CD23568D1D89F2CB69D4367FFCB3770D9C3, corresponding to > e...@apache.org, which is included in the repository's KEYS file. This > key can be found on keyservers (e.g. gpg --keyserver keys.openpgp.org > --search-key F4035CD23568D1D89F2CB69D4367FFCB3770D9C3). > > Instructions for how to verify checksums and signatures can be found in the > README (https://github.com/apache/datafu/blob/main/README.md). > > The release candidate has been tagged with release-1.8.0-rc0, which has > been signed with the same key. I've also created a branch 1.8.0. > > Please download the release candidate, check the hashes, check the > signatures, test it, and vote. The vote will be open for 72 hours (ends on > June 27th at 11 a.m. GMT+3). > > [ ] +1 approve > [ ] +0 no opinion > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > My vote: +1 > > Thanks, > Eyal Allweil >
