+1 ________________________________ From: Eyal Allweil <e...@apache.org> Sent: Wednesday, April 9, 2025 12:12 AM To: dev@datafu.apache.org <dev@datafu.apache.org> Subject: [VOTE] Apache DataFu 2.1.0 release RC0
Hi all, As we've been discussing recently, I'd like to call a vote to release Apache DataFu 2.1.0. Like our last release, this is only datafu-spark (there are no changes in the other modules). The major change of this release is extending our support of Spark to Spark 3.4. As described in our last release notes, we removed the old UDAFs which break compilation in the newer Spark versions. There are also two new methods - I will write a description of their use for our release notes. For a summary of the changes in this release, see: https://github.com/apache/datafu/blob/release-2.1.0-rc0/changes.md The source release candidate RC0 can be downloaded here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/datafu/apache-datafu-2.1.0-rc0/ The artifact (i.e. JAR) for this release candidate can be found here: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedatafu-1018 Instructions for how to build against the artifacts in the staging repository can be found in the RELEASE instructions (https://github.com/apache/datafu/blob/main/RELEASE.md). Files have been signed with PGP key 07C730990051711FF5F5C2BDDD1501E422A109F1, corresponding to e...@apache.org, which can be found on https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/eyal.asc. This key can also be found on keyservers (e.g. gpg --keyserver keys.openpgp.org --search-key 07C730990051711FF5F5C2BDDD1501E422A109F1). Instructions for how to verify checksums and signatures can be found in the README (https://github.com/apache/datafu/blob/main/README.md). The release candidate has been tagged with release-2.1.0-rc0, which has been signed with the same key. I've also created a branch 2.1.0. Please download the release candidate, check the hashes, check the signatures, test it, and vote. The vote will be open for 72 hours (ends on April 12th at 11 a.m. GMT+3). [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) My vote: +1 Thanks, Eyal Allweil
