+1, waiting for this for a long time. On 11/2/15, 11:11 AM, "Sam Shah" <shah...@umich.edu> wrote:
>+1, I think a release makes perfect sense. > >On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 10:23 AM, Matthew Hayes < >matthew.terence.ha...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I'd like to open a discussion about doing our first Apache DataFu >>release. >> I've reviewed the release checklist in the page below and I believe we >>are >> ready to do a release now. All issues under DATAFU-53 (1.3. release >>tasks) >> have been resolved. >> >> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html >> >> 1. We can create a source release with a gradle command. See RELEASE.md >> for instructions. It creates checksums and signatures. >> 2. Automated tests pass (with './gradlew check'). >> 3.1. DISCLAIMER is included as file and in Apache DataFu website. >> 3.2. LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct >> 3.3. Source files have correct license headers (checked with 'gradle >>rat') >> 3.4. Source file provence is clear >> 3.5. Dependency licenses are ok >> 3.6. Release consists of source code only >> >> For reference, here is a list of all closed JIRAs tagged with 1.3.0: >> >> >> >>https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20DATAFU%20AND%2 >>0fixVersion%20%3D%201.3.0%20ORDER%20BY%20updated%20DESC%2C%20created%20DE >>SC%2C%20status%20DESC%2C%20priority%20DESC >> >> There were 40 issues fixed, with 14 contributors. For a summary of what >> changed, see: >> >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-datafu/blob/master/changes.md >> >> If there is general agreement on readiness to do a 1.3.0 source release >> then I can create a candidate source release and we can hold a vote. >> >> Thoughts? >> >> -Matt >>
