In that discussion 5 months ago it was noted that we needed to do another
release with some LICENSE and NOTICE issues resolved.  That release
happened.  Then we completed the maturity evaluation and drafted a
graduation resolution.  Podling status is up to date as Roman just recently
updated it.  PODLINGNAMESEARCH-48 was already done for DataFu so it's not
clear to me what else we need to do.  How do we get PODLINGNAMESEARCH-48 on
file with Whimsy?

On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 2:58 AM, John D. Ament <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I see that 5 months ago you discussed graduation -
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/667c3cbba36c4550e682a3946c816f
> f8bb6e8e7789c8c74108809623@%3Cdev.datafu.apache.org%3E - that's a long
> time ago, why the huge gap in time?
>
> I would ensure that your podling status is up to date -
> http://incubator.apache.org/projects/datafu.html
> I would also check that Whimsy's roster and Podling Name Search look
> accurate - https://whimsy.apache.org/roster/ppmc/datafu (it appears you
> have no PNS)
> I would also make sure you've read through the graduation guide.  You
> mention having drafted a resolution, but I can't find any discussion of the
> resolution on list.  https://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html
>
> John
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 11:55 PM Matthew Hayes <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Roman, do you think we should share the graduation resolution with the
>> incubator general mailing list and start a discussion?
>>
>> -Matt
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 8:45 PM, Sam Shah <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> We've had the paperwork for graduation ready for a couple weeks now.
>>> What's
>>> the next step here? Happy to help however I can.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 12:40 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <[email protected]
>>> >
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > What Matthew said!
>>> >
>>> > Thanks,
>>> > Roman.
>>> >
>>> > On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 8:50 PM, Matthew Hayes
>>> > <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> > > I think DataFu is pretty close to graduating from incubator.  We
>>> > completed
>>> > > the maturity evaluation
>>> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/DATAFU/
>>> Maturity+Evaluation
>>> > and
>>> > > I've drafted a graduation resolution
>>> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.
>>> > action?pageId=68716826
>>> > > that needs to be reviewed. I'm not sure what else needs to be done
>>> > besides
>>> > > that.  John do you have any suggestion on next steps?
>>> > >
>>> > > Eyal, expanding DataFu to include Spark-related code makes sense to
>>> me.
>>> > I
>>> > > recall Russell had the same suggestion.
>>> > >
>>> > > -Matt
>>> > >
>>> > > On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 3:45 AM, Eyal Allweil <
>>> > > [email protected]> wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > >> Hi John (and everyone else),
>>> > >>
>>> > >> There isn't a lot of traffic, but over the past few months the
>>> community
>>> > >> has been working on preparing for graduation - I think we're almost
>>> > there.
>>> > >> There was one JIRA issue opened this past month by a new
>>> contributor,
>>> > which
>>> > >> I've already reviewed and need to commit. There are other issues
>>> with
>>> > >> patches that need to be decided on or reviewed.
>>> > >>
>>> > >> I think the project is still viable, but part of the lessening of
>>> > interest
>>> > >> in it is because of a general decline in Apache Pig as a platform.
>>> > >> Personally I'd like to expand DataFu to include Spark-related code,
>>> > which I
>>> > >> think will bring new contributions and contributors. Currently there
>>> > isn't
>>> > >> an open-source "home" for auxiliary Spark code, and just as DataFu
>>> has
>>> > been
>>> > >> that home for Pig, it could be for Spark.
>>> > >> Thoughts?
>>> > >> Regards,Eyal
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>     On Monday, July 10, 2017 1:28 PM, John D. Ament <
>>> > [email protected]>
>>> > >> wrote:
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>  All,
>>> > >>
>>> > >> I'd like to know the current status of DataFu.  It looks like the
>>> list
>>> > >> traffic has died down quite a bit, are you still a viable project?
>>> > >>
>>> > >> John
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> >
>>>
>>
>>

Reply via email to