On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 14:44 -0400, Terrence Enger wrote: > This silly question Yes, it was silly. I was confusing two different variables. Please accept my apology for the noise on the list.
New morning, fresh pot of coffee. I hope for better results. > arises because I am looking at issue 94543 > <http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=94543>. > > I observe in my attachement > <http://www.openoffice.org/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/68434/example_DEV300_m75.ods> > that the value > 1990-03-02 08:30:00.1000000 > is being shown as > 1990-03-02 08:39:54 > I observe further that the fraction of a second comes from > SQLGetData() as 10,000,000 nanoseconds, and that (100000000 * 1000) > modulo 65536 is 59392, and that 59392 centiseconds is the error in the > displayed value. I still think that that observation is correct, and I can even point to OResultSet.cxx line 657. Going off now to test my google skills on the definition of TIMESTAMP_STRUCT.fraction. Cheers, Terry. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@dba.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@dba.openoffice.org
