On Mon, 2012-02-06 at 16:28 +0100, Tomas Sedovic wrote: > On 02/02/2012 11:57 PM, David Lutterkort wrote: > > On Fri, 2012-02-03 at 01:34 +1100, Justin Clift wrote: > >> On 31/01/2012, at 11:36 AM, David Lutterkort wrote: > >> <snip> > >>> FWIW, we should use the git repo from now on, and not commit anything > >>> anymore to svn. > >> > >> Maybe update the info on the Deltacloud website, replacing the SVN info > >> with updated git info? > >> > >> http://deltacloud.apache.org/developers.html > >> > >> Regards and best wishes, > > > > Done. Might take a few moments before it gets pushed live. Also, the old > > git mirrors don't seem to be mirroring anymore. Trying to find out > > what's going on there. > > > > David > > > > Hi David, > > I'm not sure how long the delay is supposed to be, but the page still > references the old git repo today (6th February, 2012) > > http://deltacloud.apache.org/developers.html > > The "Getting the sources" section links to the SVN repository, and the > git command line example says `git clone > git://git.apache.org/deltacloud.git`.
Yes, it seems that site publishing is also broken as a result of the move to git. > Also, could you guys push a notice to the old repository pointing users > to the new one? It would help people who aren't subscribed to this > mailing list but are using the old repo. I am not quite sure what the official ASF policy on this is, as git is only an experiment. Otherwise, yes, we should remove everything in deltacloud svn and only place a file pointing to the new repo there. David
