I noticed I received 80 e-mails from this mailing list in my Inbox since Monday. I'm very glad to see the increased activity! But I can imagine Deltacloud users will consider that spam, especially as most e-mails contain patches or tracker notifications. It also makes it harder to find/follow discussions on functionality.
I'd like to suggest we split up the mailing list according to message purpose: 1. dev@ for discussions (new functionality, changes to existing functionality, questions from DC users); 2. patches@ for patches, jira and tracker notifications. 1. will then generally contain threads that are permanently useful to both us and DC users as reference, while 2. mainly contains messages that are mostly important in their first few days (until ACK'ed), after which they only serve as patch review history. What do you think? Regards, Dies Koper
