Hi Dies, are these truly volumes (i.e., storage that as its own lifecycle, not connected to that of the machine to which it is attached ?) If so, I believe they should be included - if they vanish when the machine vanishes, they are 'disks' not 'volumes' in CIMI lingo.
David On Fri, 2013-04-05 at 09:38 +1100, Koper, Dies wrote: > Hi, > > Should/may storage_volumes include system volumes (i.e. the "boot > drive")? > How about for the cimi volumes collection? > > For fgcp I am currently including system volumes in storage_volumes > (which with the current mapping includes them in cimi volumes). > I set the :kind attribute (aligned with rhevm) to 'system' for these > volumes. > They're attached to instances and can't be deattached. > > The reason I wanted them in storage_volumes at the time was because it > allowed me to map system volume snapshot (i.e. instance backup & > restore). > > But when I was looking at the system_volumes collection and saw all the > system volumes in there I started wondering... > > Regards, > Dies Koper > >
