I don't see an issue with this.
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 3:07 AM, Thomas Andraschko < [email protected]> wrote: > Any comments? > Sometimes it's really usefull to cache "static" views and it's the easiest > way via type safe view configuration. > I could also provide it via pull request. > > > 2013/2/14 Thomas Andraschko <[email protected]> > > > Hi Mark, > > > > somehow i missed your answers. > > I would only like to set the expires headers the for request of this > view. > > > > Regards, > > Thomas > > > > > > 2012/12/17 Mark Struberg <[email protected]> > > > >> Just out of curiosity: > >> > >> What and at which level do you like to cache? > >> > >> * do you like to cache the rendered html? > >> * do you 'intercept' and proxy the response and return the cached html > >> for every request? > >> * do you only set the 'expires' http header for the generated sites? > >> > >> > >> > >> LieGrue, > >> strub > >> > >> > >> > >> ----- Original Message ----- > >> > From: Thomas Andraschko <[email protected]> > >> > To: [email protected] > >> > Cc: > >> > Sent: Monday, December 17, 2012 5:37 PM > >> > Subject: [JSF][Proposal] ViewMetaData for HTTP caching > >> > > >> > Hi, > >> > > >> > sometimes it's required or possible to cache some views. > >> > We implemented a CODI ViewConfig based solution for this. > >> > > >> > Here is a prototype: https://gist.github.com/aab5992ab4cf5d22b2d3 > >> > > >> > What do you think? Is this useful for other users too and can we maybe > >> add > >> > it to DeltaSpike? > >> > > >> > @Gerhard > >> > Would it be possible to add a new method > >> > <T extends Annotation> T getUniqueMetaData(Class<T> target) > >> > to ViewConfigDescriptor? > >> > Many custom ViewMetaData's are unique and so we must not create a > >> ArrayList > >> > each time. > >> > > >> > > >> > Regards, > >> > Thomas > >> > > >> > > > > > -- Jason Porter http://en.gravatar.com/lightguardjp
