Well if code is released it should be stable or explicitely in
alpha/beta..maybe we should do subreleases for unstables modules
Le 11 nov. 2013 18:43, "Mark Struberg" <strub...@yahoo.de> a écrit :

> Oki folks, txs 4 the feedback, all!
>
>
> I'd say we should create the module-maturity-matrix.md first and then we
> might do the version bump.
> Maybe something like green/blue/orange/red for mature / ready but still
> needs a few features / ready but might change it's api still / work in
> progress
>
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Charles Moulliard <ch0...@gmail.com>
> > To: dev@deltaspike.apache.org
> > Cc: Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de>
> > Sent: Monday, 11 November 2013, 18:25
> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] next release version? 0.6 or 1.0?
> >
> > +1 to move to 1.0. We have done the same thing with Apache Aries moving
> > Blueprint from 0.5 to 1.0 release
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 6:17 PM, John D. Ament
> > <john.d.am...@gmail.com>wrote:
> >
> >>  Yep, agreed.  Users care about the version #.  I would recommend that
> if we
> >>  could release a 1.0 based on the current code base + some additional
> bug
> >>  fixes we'll get huge wins.
> >>
> >>  +1 to switching current to 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT.
> >>
> >>
> >>  On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 12:08 PM, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >>  > Hi!
> >>  >
> >>  > In the last 2 months I did a few conference talks and smaller
> >>  > presentations (OpenBlend, W-JAX, ..) and always got the same
> > questions:
> >>  > "it's only a 0.x version, so is it already stable? I
> > don't like to use it
> >>  > in production with 0.x"
> >>  >
> >>  > And the actual answer is: "well, core, cdictrl, etc are stable
> > since a
> >>  > long time, other modules are not yet 100% where we like them".
> >>  >
> >>  > The other fact is that we will never get all our modules 100% stable.
> >>  > Because new modules cannot be released with the same quality than
> >>  > established and well known and bugfixed modules.
> >>  >
> >>  > Thus I think we should rather introduce a kind of majurity-matrix for
> >>  > DeltaSpike.
> >>  > A simple list of modules and their majurity grade.
> >>  >
> >>  >
> >>  >
> >>  > By officially moving to 1.0 we would gain much more users.
> >>  > I personally do not care about numbers, but LOTS of users do!
> >>  >
> >>  > Wdyt?
> >>  >
> >>  > LieGrue,
> >>  > strub
> >>  >
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Charles Moulliard
> > Apache Committer / Architect @RedHat
> > Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog :  http://cmoulliard.github.io
> >
>

Reply via email to