if there are no objections, i'll update the pom.xml files by the end of the week. -> our next release (in about 2 weeks) would be v1.
regards, gerhard 2014-05-25 11:42 GMT+02:00 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <[email protected]>: > > v0.x limits our growth > Indeed > > > > 2014-05-24 22:45 GMT+02:00 Gerhard Petracek <[email protected]>: > > > (as we know) we still have to improve the documentation, examples,... > > however, one of the first impressions is the version number. > > since v0.x limits our growth, i'm ok to release v1. > > > > regards, > > gerhard > > > > > > > > 2014-05-19 13:45 GMT+02:00 Pete Muir <[email protected]>: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > (Note Rafael is away on vacation atm, so I am responding partly for him > > ;-) > > > > > > I definitely agree with getting to 1.0 asap. However also agree that we > > > need to make sure we are ready. > > > > > > If there are issues with docs, please open issues, I know Rafael will > be > > > pleased to pick any that are open up when he is back from vacation. > Same > > > for any issues like performance. > > > > > > I’ve also asked for help with the docs from our docs team at Red Hat. > > This > > > would be more of a general edit to make them read nicely, and put them > > in a > > > good order for a user to follow, rather than adding new content. > > However, I > > > haven’t managed to secure any time before July/August. I will follow up > > > with the list when I have some details. > > > > > > On 19 May 2014, at 12:40, Thomas Andraschko < > [email protected] > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > +0 > > > > - no logo > > > > - documentation... there are many TODOs. Also a docu for some for the > > > > really core features is not available (like Deactivatable). > > > > - we should check the performance of the modules. (i already openend > > some > > > > improvements for the JSF module) > > > > > > > > > > > > 2014-05-19 12:39 GMT+02:00 Karl Kildén <[email protected]>: > > > > > > > >> "Design help for the logo" > > > >> > > > >> Saw that mail just now, sounds great :-) > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> On 19 May 2014 12:37, Karl Kildén <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> > > > >>> +0 because I would really like to see a logotype selected before > 1.0. > > > >>> > > > >>> I am aware of https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DESIGN-520 and I am > > also > > > >>> fine with going with one already proposed. I just feel that every > > > project > > > >>> needs a good logo > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> On 19 May 2014 11:55, Christian Kaltepoth <[email protected]> > > > >> wrote: > > > >>> > > > >>>> +1 > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> 2014-05-19 11:34 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau < > > [email protected] > > > >: > > > >>>> > > > >>>>> +1 > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau > > > >>>>> Twitter: @rmannibucau > > > >>>>> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ > > > >>>>> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau > > > >>>>> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> 2014-05-19 11:13 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg <[email protected]>: > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>>> Hi! > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> Is there ANYTHING which holds us back from moving our version to > > > >> 1.0? > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> We are long overdue and there are SOOO many companies using > > > >>>> DeltaSpike in > > > >>>>>> production since years now... > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> LieGrue, > > > >>>>>> strub > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> -- > > > >>>> Christian Kaltepoth > > > >>>> Blog: http://blog.kaltepoth.de/ > > > >>>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/chkal > > > >>>> GitHub: https://github.com/chkal > > > >>>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Jean-Louis >
