#1
2014-06-30 23:32 GMT+02:00 Jason Porter <[email protected]>: > I think #1 is really the only way we can realistically continue forward. We > should communicate though that those matrices which use earlier versions of > the spec(s) probably will not receive as much attention, probably just bug > fixes, unless we can refactor to a base for those modules and then add new > things in base where appropriate. > > > On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 5:17 PM, John D. Ament <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > I'd agree to #1. I was actually thinking recently about how to > > re-implement core using CDI 1.1 features. I'll send out a separate > > email RE that. > > > > On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 6:51 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > ok, so I'd say 1. > > > > > > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > > > Twitter: @rmannibucau > > > Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ > > > LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau > > > Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau > > > > > > > > > 2014-06-29 0:46 GMT+02:00 Gerhard Petracek <[email protected] > >: > > >> no - i contacted esp. one server team months ago and they promised to > > fix > > >> it. > > >> however, the latest release contains fixes for several issues i > reported > > >> except this one. > > >> (and afaik there won't be any new ee6 release any time soon and an ee7 > > >> release might take some time as well.) > > >> > > >> since we might see similar issues with ee8+, we need a nice approach. > > >> > > >> regards, > > >> gerhard > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> 2014-06-29 0:09 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>: > > >> > > >>> +0 for 1 > > >>> -1 for 2 (otherwise a single branch will be maintained in practise) > > >>> are we able to "fix" them? for 3 > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> Romain Manni-Bucau > > >>> Twitter: @rmannibucau > > >>> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ > > >>> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau > > >>> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> 2014-06-29 0:03 GMT+02:00 Gerhard Petracek < > [email protected] > > >: > > >>> > hi @ all, > > >>> > > > >>> > as we have seen e.g. as7 logs exceptions during the startup due to > > our > > >>> > optional classes (needed for jsf 2.2+). > > >>> > since we really need at least some of them (otherwise we would > break > > jsf > > >>> > 2.2+ applications), we said that users should ignore those log > > entries > > >>> > (there is no impact later on). > > >>> > however, there are other servers which don't ignore it and the > > deployment > > >>> > fails. > > >>> > > > >>> > we have different options here - e.g.: > > >>> > #1 special modules once they are needed > > >>> > #2 one branch per java ee version > > >>> > #3 keep it as it is (and ignore those servers) > > >>> > > > >>> > regards, > > >>> > gerhard > > >>> > > > > > > -- > Jason Porter > http://en.gravatar.com/lightguardjp >
