Maybe it's a silly question: Does all Apache project needs to use Apache
CMS ?
Em 8/4/14, 13:51, John D. Ament escreveu:
There may be some issues here. For one, does anyone know if the
apache CMS can work in the proposed format? I believe it's a
requirement currently to separate them.
On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 12:46 PM, Rafael Benevides
<benevi...@redhat.com <mailto:benevi...@redhat.com>> wrote:
Hi all,
As you may known, Red Hat docs team was called to help on
DeltaSpike docs. After a long period, they have analyzed the
documentation and bring us an awesome plan that is available here:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/186f_amQ9XuREq8FcO7orxvOjQZtvEEYa7WPj1e8p8bM/edit#heading=h.4sqhyz68wgg2
The document is opened for comments.
Something that was also discussed not only inside Red Hat but with
some community members is about the format and source of the
documentation. I strongly believe that we should have the
documentation somewhere else but the DS site source. It could
improve the ease to the community to contribute with it. Having
said that, it's also suggested that we should use asciidoc as
documentation format.
So what we have until now ?
- The documentation plan to be reviewed and approved by the DS
community. Then we can talk about the plans to make it happen.
- The documentation location: Recommendation to be out of the site
source.
- The documentation format: Suggested to use asciidoc.
Please, read the plan and lets discuss about these 3 topics
individually.
Michelle Murray (whose team provided the plan and she is copied on
this Thread) can follow the feedback.
--
*Rafael Benevides | Senior Software Engineer*
JBoss Developer
M: +55-61-9269-6576 <tel:%2B55-61-9269-6576>
Red Hat
Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community
collaboration.
See how it works at www.redhat.com <http://www.redhat.com/>
LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/company/3258288> Youtube
<https://www.youtube.com/redhatlatam>
