If no one has any objections, I'd like to move foward with using openhub for the contributors list.
On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 3:47 PM, Gerhard Petracek <gerhard.petra...@gmail.com > wrote: > @john: > i'm not sure if romain finished all his plans with this site. > > regards, > gerhard > > > > 2014-09-07 21:38 GMT+02:00 John D. Ament <john.d.am...@gmail.com>: > > > Hi > > > > Seems like maintaining the csv file is a PITA. It's missing some newer > > committers. It also looks clearer to me who is actually active in the > > project, vs the csv file, especially at [1]. > > > > [1]: > https://www.openhub.net/p/DeltaSpike/contributors?query=&sort=commits > > > > On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 12:04 PM, Gerhard Petracek < > > gerhard.petra...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > hi john, > > > > > > @openhub - fyi: > > > we have a contributors page already (see [1]). > > > > > > regards, > > > gerhard > > > > > > [1] http://deltaspike.apache.org/contributors.html > > > > > > > > > > > > 2014-09-07 17:54 GMT+02:00 Karl Kildén <karl.kil...@gmail.com>: > > > > > > > What a great page! I did not know about Double-Submit prevention > > feature > > > > and I was actually investigating how to solve it just now :-) > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7 September 2014 17:06, John D. Ament <john.d.am...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi all > > > > > > > > > > I was looking at other apache projects and noted that many of them > > > > include > > > > > dedicated pages for each release, with some summary information > about > > > > what > > > > > went in. In DeltaSpike we're currently putting a short blurb, I > was > > > > > wondering if it makes sense to include something similar, and > perhaps > > > > even > > > > > merge with the generated release notes that make it into the SCM. > > > > > > > > > > Here's a prototype page: [1]. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://deltaspike.staging.apache.org/documentation/deltaspike_1.0.2.html > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
