[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-727?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Gerhard Petracek updated DELTASPIKE-727:
----------------------------------------
    Fix Version/s:     (was: 1.4.0)

> CdiTestSuiteRunner.LogRunListener logs multiple times
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DELTASPIKE-727
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-727
>             Project: DeltaSpike
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: TestControl
>    Affects Versions: 1.0.2
>         Environment: DeltaSpike 1.0.2 and master
> OpenWebBeans 1.2.6
> JUnit 4.11 via maven-surefire-plugin 2.17
>            Reporter: Ronald Steininger
>            Assignee: Gerhard Petracek
>            Priority: Trivial
>
> CdiTestRunner logs the "started", "finished" and "failed"-events via 
> org.apache.deltaspike.testcontrol.api.junit.CdiTestSuiteRunner.LogRunListener.
>  Using CdiTestRunner in more than one test class leads to the repeated 
> logging of said lines, with one more duplicate per @RunWith(CdiTestRunner) 
> usage.
> I've analyzed the problem a bit: CdiTestRunner works by adding an 
> LogRunListener instance to the RunNotifier in 
> CdiTestRunner#addLogRunListener, which also keeps track of the RunNotifiers 
> that already have the Listener attached via the static notifierIdentities 
> Set, only adding the Listener if the RunNotifier isn't in the Set. The 
> problem is that notifierIdentities gets cleared in 
> CdiTestRunner.AfterClassStatement#evaluate, which leaves the Listener alone 
> and thus defeats the purpose of the Set in the first place.
> I've tried removing the notifierIdentities.clear() from evaluate which fixes 
> this issue, but I'm unsure if that's the right fix for the problem. (Writing 
> a unit test which demonstrates the issue would be easy, but I have no idea 
> how to provide a test that actually fails based on the test's log output.)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to