Not exactly. If unclear read my question as: why do we *require* asm now. Before we were falling back on bytecode generation only when needed, ie not for interfaces. Why did we decided to break that?
Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber <http://www.tomitribe.com> 2016-02-12 13:57 GMT+01:00 John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>: > The proxy module provides an impl and wrapper for ASM5. An alternate impl > can be provided. > > It needs to be able to support interfaces, abstract classes and concrete > classes. > > John > > On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 7:54 AM Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Hi guys, > > > > seems we can't use data module without asm proxies. Is it intended? I > kind > > of liked the fact to rely on JVM proxies and don't see any real reason to > > not continue since we rely on InvocationHandler where interceptors can be > > handled. > > > > What do I miss? > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < > > https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber > > <http://www.tomitribe.com> > > >
