Back on the original topic.

Got some spare cycles to run a few tests. looks good. signature ok, source 
builds, rat passes, 

+1

LieGrue,
strub



> Am 18.06.2016 um 19:35 schrieb John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>:
> 
> Ok, so the patch provided didn't fix the issue 100%.  I've fixed the issue
> for all modules at this point, but I'm leaving the ticket open as I think
> we need to look closer at the changes that came in at [1] to figure out
> which are needed vs not needed and see if we can reduce our poms.
> 
> I also cannot get partial bean to pass on the Weld2 profile.  I'm wondering
> if the expected exception should be updated.
> 
> John
> 
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 6:50 AM John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
>> I ended up not getting time last night, but I did attach a path to the
>> issue this morning.  I'll push later.
>> 
>> John
>> 
>> 
>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 4:56 PM John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Yep, no worries.  I'm patient (secretly points all projects to staging
>>> repo) (j/k)
>>> 
>>> @Matej could you apply the fixes in master?  If not I can probably get to
>>> it late tomorrow.
>>> 
>>> John
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 4:46 PM Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> If it’s only an error in the script then it’s surely not a show stopper.
>>>> 
>>>> Could you please just apply the fix in master so others don’t fall into
>>>> this trap as well? ;)
>>>> 
>>>> Will continue my review (but probably tomorrow, already really tired
>>>> today)
>>>> 
>>>> txs and LieGrue,
>>>> strub
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> Am 15.06.2016 um 22:16 schrieb John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Looks like the buildall script has the same bug as I reported.
>>>>> 
>>>>> These two lines:
>>>>> 
>>>>> mvn clean install -PWeld -Dweld.version=1.1.10.Final | tee
>>>>> mvn-weld1_1_10.log
>>>>> 
>>>>> mvn clean install -PWeld -Dweld.version=1.1.28.Final | tee
>>>>> mvn-weld1_1_28.log
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Should be:
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> mvn clean install -PWeld1 -Dweld.version=1.1.10.Final | tee
>>>>> mvn-weld1_1_10.log
>>>>> 
>>>>> mvn clean install -PWeld1 -Dweld.version=1.1.28.Final | tee
>>>>> mvn-weld1_1_28.log
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> I didn't notice as I run these manually
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> So, cancel and fix? or leave it?
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> John
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 4:02 PM Mark Struberg
>>>> <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> No, that’s a separate one. It is not in the cdictrl module but in the
>>>>>> scheduler module.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Just unpack the source.zip from the 1.7.0 release candidate and run
>>>> the
>>>>>> buildall.sh script and you’ll see what I mean.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> LieGrue,
>>>>>> strub
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Am 15.06.2016 um 16:08 schrieb John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org
>>>>> :
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> There might be some issue with the Weld profile(s) and the cdictrl
>>>>>> module.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> If I do -PWeld1, it activates the OWB profile in cdictrl.  I have to
>>>> do
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I have to do this to build it properly (from the root):
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> mvn clean install -PWeld -PWeld1 -Dweld.version=1.1.10.Final
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> If it makes sense, we can cancel this vote, fix that build issue and
>>>> move
>>>>>>> on, but I don't believe this is a critical issue and can be fixed in
>>>> a
>>>>>>> follow up 1.7.1 release.  This *might* be the issue @struberg is
>>>> facing.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> John
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 9:26 AM Matej Novotny <manov...@redhat.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> @struberg, if you are talking about master branch build, than it
>>>> works
>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>> me with Weld 1.x (tried 1.1.28 && 1.1.10).
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Just tried it with: mvn clean install -PWeld1
>>>>>> -Dweld.version=1.1.28.Final
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Matej
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>>>>>> From: "Mark Struberg" <strub...@yahoo.de.INVALID>
>>>>>>>>> To: "deltaspike" <dev@deltaspike.apache.org>
>>>>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2016 2:52:59 PM
>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache DeltaSpike 1.7.0
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Can someone plz check this version with Weld?
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> [ERROR]   mvn <goals> -rf :deltaspike-scheduler-module-impl
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Did blow up both with  weld1_1_28 and 1_1_10
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> LieGrue,
>>>>>>>>> strub
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Am 13.06.2016 um 14:09 schrieb Antoine Sabot-Durand
>>>>>>>>>> <anto...@sabot-durand.net>:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Le lun. 13 juin 2016 à 13:21, John D. Ament <
>>>> johndam...@apache.org> a
>>>>>>>>>> écrit :
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> I guess I'll be the first to vote?  Obviously I'm +1 since I ran
>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>> release twice to make sure no issues...
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> John
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 8:10 PM John D. Ament <
>>>> johndam...@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> All,
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> I was running the needed tasks to get the 1.7.0 release of
>>>> Apache
>>>>>>>>>>>> DeltaSpike out.
>>>>>>>>>>>> The artifacts are deployed to Nexus [1], the source release
>>>>>>>> available at
>>>>>>>>>>>> [2].
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> The tag is available at [3] and will get pushed to the ASF
>>>>>> repository
>>>>>>>>>>> once
>>>>>>>>>>>> the vote passed.
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> The release notes can be found at [4].
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Please take a look at the 1.7.0 artifacts and vote!
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Please note:
>>>>>>>>>>>> This vote is "majority approval" with a minimum of three
>>>> binding +1
>>>>>>>> votes
>>>>>>>>>>>> (see [5]).
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +0
>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be
>>>>>>>> released,
>>>>>>>>>>>> and why..............
>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>> John
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> PS - I found a few issues with the release steps, which I will
>>>>>> update
>>>>>>>>>>>> after the release is complete.
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedeltaspike-1038/
>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedeltaspike-1038/org/apache/deltaspike/deltaspike/1.7.0/
>>>>>>>>>>>> [3]
>>>> https://github.com/johnament/deltaspike/tree/deltaspike-1.7.0
>>>>>>>>>>>> [4] https://s.apache.org/DeltaSpike-1.7.0
>>>>>>>>>>>> [5] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 

Reply via email to