Hi Matej, about running DS it should be fine with a jdk 8 (or maven toolchain using java 6 to compile and 8 to run for weld 3 tests)
About CDI 2.0 I think it is a bit early and discussions - IIRC - didnt lead to any feature yet, just a "if we are blocked on 1 we can do a 2" but nothing yet motivating it. That said time is the only blocker if we find any feature deeply requiring CDI 2. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | JavaEE Factory <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> 2016-12-20 9:33 GMT+01:00 Matej Novotny <[email protected]>: > Hello > > Since we got CDI 2.0 knocking on the door, I wanted to ask what are the > plans for DS in this regard? > > ATM CDI 2.0.Beta1 is out and Weld 3.0.0.Beta1 will follow shortly. > I tried building DS and running tests (with the above^) just out of habit, > but I realized that won't work. > Currently, DS has compilation source/target set to 1.6 and CDI 2.0 uses > default methods hence requiring 1.8. > > So before rushing into any duck tape fixing, I would like to know, what > are the plans? > I recall there was some mail discussion about new branch, but I don't > think there was any outcome. > > > Regards > Matej >
