[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16124726#comment-16124726 ]
John D. Ament commented on DELTASPIKE-940: ------------------------------------------ [~tandraschko] sorry thought I had already responded. The problem with pulling it out is that it has to be in two places, since this annotation can control both transactions and repository. Having it in a common place makes more sense. > @Transactional and @EntityManagerConfig each use a different method to > resolve EntityManagers > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: DELTASPIKE-940 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-940 > Project: DeltaSpike > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Data-Module, JPA-Module > Reporter: Xavier Dury > Assignee: John D. Ament > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 1.8.1 > > Attachments: ds940.patch > > > When an application uses multiple {{EntityManager}}'s, there must be a way to > specify which one(s) should be used. Currently, {{@Transactional}} and > {{@EntityManagerConfig}} use different approaches: > - {{@Transactional}} can take one or more qualifiers directly in its > {{qualifier()}} member ({{@Transactional(qualifier = MyDB.class)}}) > - While {{@EntityManagerConfig}} must define an {{EntityManagerResolver}} > ({{@EntityManagerConfig(entityManagerResolver = > MyDBEntityManagerResolver.class}}) > I think both should be unified and use a single way to specify which > {{EntityManager}} to use. IMHO, the {{@Transactional}} way of doing looks > better and should be applied to {{@EntityManagerConfig}}. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029)