On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 2:00 PM John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote:

> On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 1:21 PM Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid>
> wrote:
>
>> > ShouldnÄ…t we just disable the update check in our quartz configuration?
>>
>> Well there is a flag to disable this behaviour, but a.) it's hard to set
>> (requires -D) and it doesn't disable 100%.
>> The code still does some http calls out :/
>>
>
> You can disable it programmatically.  I've done wireshark checks, there is
> no other HTTP calls made out.  Here's a quick patch that does it:
>
>
> https://github.com/johnament/deltaspike/commit/5a4fec98ff3f8f6ed6b54c36332bb8621cd3b09d
>

Here's a more interesting thing, looks like for Quartz 2.3 they changed
from an opt out to an opt in -
https://github.com/quartz-scheduler/quartz/commit/dfe1e5a3cc248e2a46a6ea55567aaa6dc8e15ca5

John


>
>
> John
>
>
>>
>> That's really bad, and the terracotta community (or rather the firm
>> behind it) declined to disable it by default since 2010 :/
>>
>> @Tomas, yes there is additional effort to maintain it. But imo it's worth
>> it.
>>
>> @Romain, John the question for me is rather where we do like to keep the
>> code.
>> Either here in DeltaSpike or at geronimo? The reason is that we might
>> also later use this in other projects (TomEE) as well.
>>
>> For now I'd just start to play a bit with it over here and then we can
>> still move it around later.
>>
>> LieGrue,
>> strub
>>
>>
>> > Am 05.01.2018 um 17:44 schrieb Arne Limburg <
>> arne.limb...@openknowledge.de>:
>> >
>> > Hi Mark,
>> >
>> > ShouldnÄ…t we just disable the update check in our quartz configuration?
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> > Arne
>> >
>> >
>> > Am 05.01.18 17:39 schrieb "Mark Struberg" unter
>> > <strub...@yahoo.de.INVALID>:
>> >
>> >> Hi folks!
>> >> Since I've now had a few complaints about Quartz 'phoning home'
>> (totally
>> >> useless update check), I'm really inclined to just kick out quartz and
>> >> implement the Scheduler ourselves.
>> >> Implementing a proper Scheduler is not that complicated anyway, so do
>> we
>> >> like to roll this ourselves?
>> >> Or do you think I underestimate the effort?
>> >>
>> >> LieGrue,strub
>> >
>>
>>

Reply via email to