On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 2:00 PM John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 1:21 PM Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid> > wrote: > >> > ShouldnÄ…t we just disable the update check in our quartz configuration? >> >> Well there is a flag to disable this behaviour, but a.) it's hard to set >> (requires -D) and it doesn't disable 100%. >> The code still does some http calls out :/ >> > > You can disable it programmatically. I've done wireshark checks, there is > no other HTTP calls made out. Here's a quick patch that does it: > > > https://github.com/johnament/deltaspike/commit/5a4fec98ff3f8f6ed6b54c36332bb8621cd3b09d > Here's a more interesting thing, looks like for Quartz 2.3 they changed from an opt out to an opt in - https://github.com/quartz-scheduler/quartz/commit/dfe1e5a3cc248e2a46a6ea55567aaa6dc8e15ca5 John > > > John > > >> >> That's really bad, and the terracotta community (or rather the firm >> behind it) declined to disable it by default since 2010 :/ >> >> @Tomas, yes there is additional effort to maintain it. But imo it's worth >> it. >> >> @Romain, John the question for me is rather where we do like to keep the >> code. >> Either here in DeltaSpike or at geronimo? The reason is that we might >> also later use this in other projects (TomEE) as well. >> >> For now I'd just start to play a bit with it over here and then we can >> still move it around later. >> >> LieGrue, >> strub >> >> >> > Am 05.01.2018 um 17:44 schrieb Arne Limburg < >> arne.limb...@openknowledge.de>: >> > >> > Hi Mark, >> > >> > ShouldnÄ…t we just disable the update check in our quartz configuration? >> > >> > Cheers, >> > Arne >> > >> > >> > Am 05.01.18 17:39 schrieb "Mark Struberg" unter >> > <strub...@yahoo.de.INVALID>: >> > >> >> Hi folks! >> >> Since I've now had a few complaints about Quartz 'phoning home' >> (totally >> >> useless update check), I'm really inclined to just kick out quartz and >> >> implement the Scheduler ourselves. >> >> Implementing a proper Scheduler is not that complicated anyway, so do >> we >> >> like to roll this ourselves? >> >> Or do you think I underestimate the effort? >> >> >> >> LieGrue,strub >> > >> >>