+1 to fix the license and keep the shade
Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> 2018-01-15 9:59 GMT+01:00 Thomas Andraschko <[email protected]>: > We shaded it for compatibility reasons as many libs use ASM. > > 2018-01-15 9:06 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg <[email protected]>: > > > +1 can you plz file a ticket? > > > > txs and LieGrue, > > strub > > > > > > > Am 13.01.2018 um 15:35 schrieb John D. Ament <[email protected]>: > > > > > > The license for proxy-module's impl-asm binary JAR is generated > > > incorrectly. Do we need to include a shaded ASM? If we do, we need to > > > include the BSD-3-Clause license in the generated JAR. > > > > > > John > > > > >
