hi @ all, since we will need to maintain v1.8.x for a while and it's too early for using cdi 2.0 (for a while), we should discuss if we should have one branch using cdi 1.2+. it would allow to get rid of several workarounds (and the corresponding warnings during the bootstrapping process).
we had a short discussion in the irc-channel about the following options: #1) ds v1.x as it is right now; ds v2: jdk8 with cdi 1.2+ vs #2) ds v1.8.x: as it is right now; ds > v1.8.x && < v2.x: jdk8 with cdi v1.2+; ds v2: jdk8 with cdi 2.0+ vs #3) we don't care about v1.2 as a min. requirement at all (the workarounds are minimal anyway and users can continue to ignore the warnings during the bootstrapping process) or for sure #4) [any other nice suggestion] -> please send your preferred approach regards, gerhard
