Still means it doesnt have to be in the API right?

Le 26 avr. 2018 00:44, "Gerhard Petracek" <[email protected]> a écrit :

> #1 with cdi 1.0 (or to be more concrete: owb for cdi 1.0) you can't get rid
> of pre-configured interceptors (that's why we introduced the
> interceptor-strategy concept initially).
> #2 e.g. TransactionStrategy has benefits beyond that (a public example is
> the usage in the ds-data-module)
>
> regards,
> gerhard
>
>
>
> 2018-04-25 6:58 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>:
>
> > I get it but it means we add a layer on top of interceptor for
> > pluggability. This is actually built in in CDI so not really needed.
> >
> > Also the hierarchy point is fine but should be per type of strategy and
> > therefore we dont need a generic one in the api.
> >
> > As a user if i use DS and an interceptor, do i need to impl this public
> > api? Never normally so this sounds more misleading or reinventing the
> wheel
> > than anything else for me.
> >
> > That said we can move it in our impl modules to keep the feature but
> still
> > a clean api.
> >
> > Le 24 avr. 2018 23:21, "Gerhard Petracek" <[email protected]> a
> écrit :
> >
> > > a concrete example:
> > > @Transactional
> > >
> > > ->
> > > @Interceptor is on TransactionalInterceptor whereas InterceptorStrategy
> > is
> > > the marker interface for the strategies (and not the interceptor) - in
> > this
> > > case TransactionStrategy.
> > >
> > > (to quickly get an overview of all interceptor-strategies you just need
> > to
> > > open the hierarchy-view for InterceptorStrategy and you have everything
> > you
> > > need with one step...)
> > >
> > > regards,
> > > gerhard
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > 2018-04-24 22:35 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>:
> > >
> > > > Hmm not sure i get it, annotations are hard to browse in IDE? Is it
> > what
> > > it
> > > > addresses?
> > > >
> > > > Le 24 avr. 2018 21:10, "Gerhard Petracek" <[email protected]> a
> > > écrit :
> > > >
> > > > > hi romain,
> > > > >
> > > > > not really. 1 interceptor could have n strategies as candidates
> (e.g.
> > > see
> > > > > TransactionStrategy for which we provide multiple implementations
> > > > > out-of-the-box).
> > > > > that's the whole concept. the marker interfaces is just to find all
> > > > > strategies in a project easily.
> > > > > we have it since 02/2011 (back then it was  codi) and a lot of
> users
> > > are
> > > > > using it (during the dev. process) and i haven't heard about any
> > > concern
> > > > > (from users).
> > > > >
> > > > > regards,
> > > > > gerhard
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > 2018-04-24 19:31 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <
> [email protected]
> > >:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Le 24 avr. 2018 19:18, "Gerhard Petracek" <[email protected]>
> a
> > > > > écrit :
> > > > > >
> > > > > >  it was always just a marker-interface to list all
> > > > interceptor-strategies
> > > > > > easily.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > But if it is just interceptors, doesnt @Interceptor fulfills that
> > > > > already?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > My only concern is exposing it in api to user where it is
> actually
> > a
> > > > dead
> > > > > > interface.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > gerhard
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2018-04-24 13:47 GMT+02:00 Thomas Andraschko <
> > > > > [email protected]
> > > > > > >:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > basically +1
> > > > > > > but its still used currently
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2018-04-23 11:46 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <
> > > [email protected]
> > > > >:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hi guys,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Do we still need InterceptorStrategy?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > If not, can we deprecate it and remove it from our built-in
> > > > > > interceptors?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > > > > > > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> > > > > > > > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
> > > > > > > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> > https://github.com/
> > > > > > > > rmannibucau> |
> > > > > > > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
> > > > > > > > <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-
> > > > > > > > ee-8-high-performance>
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to