Hi lords and ladies!

I would like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache DeltaSpike-1.8.2.
This is a maintenance release with java6 compatibility.

The following tickets got resolved:

Bug

    [DELTASPIKE-1276] - Multiple license headers
    [DELTASPIKE-1299] - Order by items are applied in alphabetic order
    [DELTASPIKE-1310] - Please use https (SSL) for links to KEYS, hashes, sigs
    [DELTASPIKE-1313] - DeltaSpikeProxyInterceptorLookup fails on WAS
    [DELTASPIKE-1316] - add dynamic annotations feature, configurable via config
    [DELTASPIKE-1317] - AnnotatedCallableImpl blows up with ArrayOutofBounds 
when parsing enums
    [DELTASPIKE-1344] - deltaspike-cdictrl-owb has a transient runtime 
dependency on Shrinkwrap and Arquillian

New Feature

    [DELTASPIKE-1319] - labeled alternatives
    [DELTASPIKE-1320] - global alternative spi to support custom (type-safe) 
mechanisms
    [DELTASPIKE-1337] - optional ClassFilter spi
    [DELTASPIKE-1338] - support class-filter per test

Improvement

    [DELTASPIKE-1309] - Upgrade ASM
    [DELTASPIKE-1311] - Allow Excluded Repositories
    [DELTASPIKE-1329] - ProjectStageProducer should log changed values
    [DELTASPIKE-1331] - minor type improvement of the ViewConfigNode spi
    [DELTASPIKE-1332] - support further cases for custom view-meta-data
    [DELTASPIKE-1334] - javadoc for ConfigPreProcessor#beforeAddToConfig
    [DELTASPIKE-1339] - Add support for dynamic interceptor binding, added via 
Extension

Task

    [DELTASPIKE-1257] - Research why BOM isn't working right in a release
    [DELTASPIKE-1312] - Upgrade to quartz-2.3.0


Here is the staging repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedeltaspike-1047/

The source zip can be found at
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedeltaspike-1047/org/apache/deltaspike/deltaspike/1.8.2/
sha1 is add349e89314d9384dc9dc08772af275048343ba

Please VOTE:

[+1] yes, ship it
[+0] meh, don't care
[-1] stop there is a ${showstopper}

The VOTE is open for 72h

txs and LieGrue,
strub

Reply via email to