Cool, thanks, One other thing seems to make little sense after Reza split many parts into 1.0 / 2.0 (similar to Tomcat maybe 1.0.x or 1.x would be better but that I guess everyone could live with;-) who would use /branches/2.0 now? Not critical, but seems it can be removed on branches some time.
With regards to descriptive naming, Reza's W3C module (currently not built by any POM so we can leave it where it is) is really an equivalent to "Portlet Bridge for JSF", as the Portals project where I'm committer, too shows: http://portals.apache.org/ It contains sub-projects like "Pluto" or "Bridges". And the latter is for the Portlet Bridge. Could be a way to tell them apart. Werner On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 9:31 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz <[email protected] > wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 11:36 PM, Werner Keil <[email protected]> > wrote: > >...what was the reason to deviate from > > Bertrand's suggestion like "w3c-ddr" and use an upper-case "ODDR" folder > > under /clients?... > > I agree that w3c-ddr is more neutral, I have made that change in > revision 1675548. > > -Bertrand >
