There's certainly room for improvement regarding browsers and their sometimes (see Firefox or also Chrome) rapidly increasing version numbers. "Google.Chrome.1.0.0.0" is there already, btw.;-)
Werner On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 5:23 PM, Reza Naghibi <[email protected]> wrote: > Right, forgot about that, that will be a good starting point for 2.0. > > The concern is that if we have to iterate each browser version with its > attributes, the browser pattern/attribute file will contain hundreds of > entries and be very heavy. So im thinking we will have a lightweight > browser domain and a more heavy and detailed browser domain. Lightweight > will contain the basic patterns for popular browser (chrome, firefox, > safari, ie, etc) and basic attributes, so a few KB, ideal for > web/javascript usage. The heavy version will have all browser patterns and > very detailed browser attributes. Could still be used on web, but it will > have larger overhead. > > Volkan, I have reviewed your commits, great job!!! Thanks for adding these > devices!!! > > On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 4:17 AM, Werner Keil <[email protected]> wrote: > > > It (list of browsers) always was there: > > > > > https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/devicemap/trunk/data/1.0/device-data/src/main/resources/devicedata/BrowserDataSource.xml?view=markup > > Just not using it (by most clients;-) > > > > Werner > > > > On Sat, May 2, 2015 at 11:11 PM, Reza Naghibi <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Where do you see a list of browsers??? > > > > > > > > > > > > <div>-------- Original message --------</div><div>From: Volkan Yazıcı < > > > [email protected]> </div><div>Date:05/02/2015 4:54 PM > > (GMT-05:00) > > > </div><div>To: [email protected] </div><div>Cc: > > > </div><div>Subject: Google Chrome </div><div> > > > </div>Hi, > > > > > > Shouldn't we have a Google Chrome in the list of browsers? > > > Am I missing something obvious? > > > > > > Best. > > > > > >
