Hi Tiexin, Thanks for the proposal. I'm on board with the change in the long term. Let's develop a roadmap that addresses the concerns Klesh mentioned so that we can make the switch smoothly.
Best, Hezheng On Mon, Jun 5, 2023 at 8:37 PM Klesh Wong <[email protected]> wrote: > Sounds good to me overall. > However, we should also address the following problems: > > The dashboards are highly dependent on the Domain Layer definition from > the devlake repo, How do we keep track of them? e.g. dashboards > developed for v0.18 might not work on v0.17. Keep in mind we have to > make old dashboards should be upgraded or downgraded automatically while > users upgrade/downgrad the helm chart. @IronCore864 > Currently, we have some dashboards specifically designed for data > verification (for both Testing and Debugging), should we deploy the helm > in order to do so? if so, we should set up an automated CD system for > testing. @IronCore864 @abeizn > How do we and users develop new dashboards or upgrade existing ones, we > need documents to guide users on how to do so and submit their > contribution. @IronCore864 @Startrekzky > > On 6/2/2023 10:02 PM, Tiexin Guo wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > There is a proposal from a while ago: > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-devlake-helm-chart/issues/120 > > > > It's about managing Grafana as a dependency (instead of including it in > the > > DevLake helm chart). > > > > I've done some research (and a draft PR), and I think it's a good idea. > > I have created a short description of this proposal here: > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-devlake-helm-chart/issues/120#issuecomment-1573642213 > > Please review and provide some feedback. > > > > Thanks! > > Tiexin Guo > > > >
