danieljuhasz93 opened a new issue, #6646:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-devlake/issues/6646

   ### Search before asking
   
   - [X] I had searched in the 
[issues](https://github.com/apache/incubator-devlake/issues?q=is%3Aissue) and 
found no similar issues.
   
   
   ### What happened
   
   **Context:**
   We use the GitFlow branching strategy in our team. This means that we only 
merge the changes to the main branch when we are ready for a (internal) 
release. Because of this pull requests from the develop to the main branch can 
include several commits.
   
   **Issue:**
   We encountered an issue with the calculation of the Lead Time for Changes 
DORA metric. If a pull request has more than 250 commits, then only the first 
250 commits are retrieved, and the oldest retrieved commit is treated as the 
first commit of the pull request. This leads to the incorrect calculation of 
the PR coding time and PR change lead time.
   
   ### What do you expect to happen
   
   I would expect that all of the commits in a PR are retrieved instead of only 
the first 250 commits.
   
   ### How to reproduce
   
   Prerequisites: a merged PR with more than 250 commits should exist in the 
repository.
   
   1. Collect data from the beforementioned repository with the DORA option 
enabled
   2. Inspect the Lead Time for Changes values on the built-in DORA dashboard.
   
   ### Anything else
   
   The issue occurs every time, if we have a PR with more than 250 commits.
   
   ### Version
   
   v0.18.0
   
   ### Are you willing to submit PR?
   
   - [ ] Yes I am willing to submit a PR!
   
   ### Code of Conduct
   
   - [X] I agree to follow this project's [Code of 
Conduct](https://www.apache.org/foundation/policies/conduct)
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to