On Saturday 30 July 2005 01:14, Jim Jagielski wrote: > GPL says that no > other license can place restrictions or requirements on code > that the GPL does not already place on it (think of the > old AL and the "advertising clause")
And for ALv2 it is about the patent grants and license termination. (Personally, I don't understand the usa case that FSF Legal Counsel is constructing, but it looks very bizarre, as it involves the patent owner to license code covered by the patent under GPL.) Cheers Niclas
