I'm soryy,
i've forgott the mina prefix...
Johannes Zillmann schrieb:
Dear mina team,
currently i'm participate in 2 projects in which network communication
plays a big role.
The profile of the projects looks similar:
- there is a lot of coordination communication to do, whereat mina is
great
- but a lot of large data blocks(simply call it files..) has to be
moved as well, whereat mina naturally can't beat fe a simple bio
socket implementation in performance
After testing a lot and thinking some time about it, i came to the
point that the simplest way to gain the efforts of using
mina but not loosing any piece of performance is to have the
possibilty to get direct access to a sessions socket (no matter if bio
or nio).
This would avoid the overhead of chunking, filtering,... data which is
not intended to do so.
And it would allow things like
FileChannel fc;
SocketChannel sc;
fc.transferFrom(sc,0,23);
Of cause it may break the api ?
What do you think about ?
best regards
Johannes
___________________________________________________________
Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de
