It really depends on what Tomcat says. If they want to use the code, that's great. If they want to take patches such that we can update to make it a dependency, that's fine too. If they don't respond at all again, it doesn't give me a lot of hope that patches will be applied in a timely manner either - but that's an entirely different problem :)
I still think it is very useful and could be a lot better (for instance, not silently swallowing important exceptions, IIRC). However, I'm not using it anymore, and unless I find an excuse to I'm unlikely to have a lot of time to do anything with it unfortunately. I don't think it should be archived - if it ends up that it stays here then it would be good to give it a scrub and 1.0 release and see if anyone picks up on it. It is useful, so there's a good chance of that. - Brett On 1/8/06, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sorry - I have been having some "technical difficulties" this week. > > I am still on the fence re jar dependency on tomcat naming, > maintaining the full source or letting it go dormant. I am still > interested in others' ideas on this. I am willing to do the work to > refactor for the first option and move to m2, but would also happlily > review and apply patches from others who may be interested in getting > involved in [naming]. If there is no community or user interest in > pushing forward, I am also happy to archive and move on to other > things... > > > Phil > > On 1/7/06, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It's structure is already as desired multiproject wise. Since it has a > > separate release cycle, I think its best to keep it under a separate > > trunk. > > > > Phil made a couple of nice extensions to the build like aggregated > > javadoc that we haven't done for the m2 javadoc plugin yet. Might need > > to get those in order before converting. > > > > Either way, we really need to find out where it is going with regards > > to the discussion the other day before doing anything. > > > > - Brett > > > > On 1/8/06, Alex Karasulu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Anyone going to maven2ify it? I can move it into the new structure if > > > you guys like? > > > > > > Alex > > > > > >
