On 1/12/06, Vinod Panicker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 1/11/06, Alex Karasulu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Vinod Panicker wrote: > > > > >Hi, > > > > > >Wanted to checkout mina to build it, and I noticed that the directory > > >trunk has been renamed to "trunks". Just wondering - why a > > >non-standard approach? > > > > > > > > Just to be clear that we have more than one project's trunk in there. > > Worth the move you think? > > It would have got my -1, but that doesn't matter. Humour me on this > pls... Is there a clear line between what constitutes a module and a > dependency? Couldnt apacheds have say mina as a dependency rather > than as a module? > > In that case, we could have had the directory trunk and outside of it, > the other projects with their respective trunks. > > And since directory has modules, then it still constitutes a single > project IMO - so even that doesnt show a need to call trunk as > "trunks" :)
Just read Brett's mail after I replied to Alex's. No need for responses if there's already been a lot of discussion on this already. Regards, Vinod.
