Trustin Lee schrieb:
2006/1/13, Johannes Zillmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>:
> For now there's no way to achieve the same behavior with
this. But I
> guess we can implement this by providing a special write request
object:
>
> IoSession session = ...;
> session.write( new TransferRequest( fc, 0, 23 ) );
>
> WDYT?
Well i think there are 2 sides. The sending and the receiving... ;)
For the sending part the above approach looks very nice !
For the receiving part could you think of somthing like :
socketSession.decoupleSocketChannel() -> SocketChannel
??
Now I got it. You want to receive data from the channel directly.
This is not possible because it will cause serious concurrency issue
with SocketIoProcessor. All I/O has to happen in the worker thread
that SocketIoProcessor manager. It you want to use blocking I/O for
this, then you'll have to use StreamIoHandler for now. Please let me
know if you have any good idea to resolve this issue.
I'don't setp deep into nio or mina core yet,
so is that possible ...
If you haven a connected session and decide now to get directly acces to
socketChannel
-> tell the SocketIoProcessor that it should not perform any read/writes
on the session socket channel (mayby just with setting a sessions attribute)
-> retrieve the socketCjannle from session
-> work with it
-> maybe integrate it back to SocketIoProcessor io-work
?
Johannes
___________________________________________________________
Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de
